<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would you use a T-1 gateway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rptricks.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/11/would-you-use-a-t-1-gateway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rptricks.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/11/would-you-use-a-t-1-gateway/</link>
	<description>Fun and Games with Microsoft Response Point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:08:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig LaHote</title>
		<link>http://www.rptricks.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/11/would-you-use-a-t-1-gateway/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig LaHote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rptricks.com/blog/?p=59#comment-225</guid>
		<description>No, not until other features are added to RP that improve the ability to handle the number of simultaneous calls that a T1 might present.  Without the ability to pickup a ringing line from any phone, bail out of voicemail back to the attendant, and other such features, RP isn&#039;t a good fit for most sites that would have the number of users that are justified by a T1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not until other features are added to RP that improve the ability to handle the number of simultaneous calls that a T1 might present.  Without the ability to pickup a ringing line from any phone, bail out of voicemail back to the attendant, and other such features, RP isn&#8217;t a good fit for most sites that would have the number of users that are justified by a T1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
